Oct 14, 2016

Tesla's innovations are transforming the auto industry

Tesla deserves its high market cap only if it can reach profitability – preferably in the next four years. Musk has long stated that the path to success was to start at the high end of the market with cars like the Model S and X and then move down market, producing more affordable cars like the Model 3. But if Tesla can’t make money on expensive vehicles as some analysts suggest, the obvious question is: can they make money selling cars at half the price?



The answer? Absolutely. Tesla’s improvement in cost per vehicle shows Tesla is making money on the Model S and will likely make solid profits on the Model 3. Let us explain. One of the tools of any strategist is a scale (or experience) curve. A scale curve calculates how rapidly the cost per unit (in this case, vehicle) decreases with every doubling of unit volume.[1] This analysis is useful for projecting how Tesla’s costs per unit will change going forward based upon its history.

A scale curve analysis on quarterly cost and production data from 2012-2014[2] shows Tesla’s cost of production per Model S at the end of 2014 was around $50,000 per vehicle (See Figure 1). This is actually quite good for a Model S with an average selling price of about $85,000. It means Tesla’s losses are a result of significant investments in sales and R&D to launch Models S, X and 3, and to build the battery Gigafactory. It also shows Tesla’s cost per unit has been dropping roughly 20% with each doubling of unit volume.

The bottom line is that sustaining Tesla’s lofty stock price depends on Model 3 volume. Musk was right when arguing that Model S and X were key to launching Model 3—the car that can drive the firm to profitability. If Model 3 generates 400,000 orders per year (the number of current reservations), the lofty stock price makes sense. If not, that’s obviously a very different ending to the story.